CentOS vs. Fedora

[Lonni J Friedman]

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Collins Richey wrote:

> I'm currently in the process of evaluating distros for a local project
> to equip untrained users with Linux PCs and some level of training in
> the use of Linux applications. In the past few days I've put up both
> FC3 and CentOS 4.0_rc1. I've worked with FC3 for a few days, and now
> I'm doing the same with CentOS.
>
> One of our local LUG members has worked with CentOS and recommends it
> for less well qualified users because the upgrade cycle is longer that
> the cycle for FCn solutions. Thus far in my testing, I can find little
> difference between the two with the one exception: CentOS does not
> properly enable my sound card.
>
> I know we have lots of members who work with and recommend Fedora. Do
> we have any CentOS users or anyone who can throw in any
> recommendations?

CentOS = Redhat Enterprise Server 3 minus the RH branding.

Its way older than any release of Fedora.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        netllama at linux-sxs.org
LlamaLand				http://netllama.linux-sxs.org