Need to split /home

[Aaron Grewell]

> Their 'version churn' keeps pace with the latest stable release of all the
> components.  I don't consider that to be rapid, and i've not seen very
> much in the way of overall version drift in FC2 for packages that are
> used on a server, rather than the desktop..  For example, apache
> updates have been solely for security fixes.  But instead of being stupid,
and back
> porting everything, they are keeping pace with the oficial apcahe
> devlopment cycle.
> 

Right, but what about the 6 month support cycle?  Even with Fedora
Legacy, you still only get a year and a half of updates.  That's what
I'm concerned about.  Sure it works great now, but if in a year and a
half I have to either upgrade or start building my own packages that's a
pain.  We tend to run mission-critical boxes that work well until
they're no longer supported in order to prevent user aggravation.  I'd
much rather only do that every 4 years.