FC3 upgrade without booting off cd

David Bandel david.bandel
Fri Nov 12 05:29:34 PST 2004


OK, you didn't show me the DSN, but I'll bet it was: 5.7.1, gmail.com
returned "".

This is a 'no-reverse DNS' error.  Yahoo will do this a _lot_.  Most
of their mail servers aren't reversed.  Apparently, at least one of
gmail's servers isn't reversed properly either (not just not reversed
as a mail server, DNS doesn't return _anything_).  Unfortunately, no
reverse == bogon.

I will be working on this today.  I can short-circuit the check, it
just means I have to maintain everyone in the access.db file.

Aaaaarrrrrgggghhh!


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:27:44 -0500, Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 9:11 am, someone claiming to be David Bandel
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:04:43 -0500, Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org> wrote:
> > > On 11/11/2004 8:53 AM, I believe that Net Llama! wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Brad De Vries wrote:
> > > >>On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:21:20 +1100, James McDonald
> <snippety>
> 
> 
> > Probably because during the upgrade process there's at least an hour
> > (if not more) where the services provided by the system are not
> > available.  The upgrade the original poster wants to do would allow
> > services to continue to run until the new service is installed, and
> > then a simple restart handles the problem.
> >
> > This is one of the nice things about Debian upgrades.  They aren't a
> > .. OK, everything is going down for the next few hours .. deal.  Same
> > for Gentoo.  You upgrade little by little on a daily or weekly basis
> > and are always current.
> >
> 
> Well, point taken. I assumed this wasn't a critical production server but
> rather a personal use home PC, or non-critical machine. Especially because
> we're talking about FC3. I didn't think anybody'd be putting FC3 on a
> production server just yet.
> 
> Tim
> 
> PS I've been getting bounces off and on from linux-sxs.org. This morning I was
> able to send a message from my home system without any problem, but tonight,
> I've received the following message:
> 
> A message (from <tim at thewunders.org>) was received at 12 Nov 2004  2:01:21
> +0000.
> 
> The following addresses had delivery problems:
> 
> <general at linux-sxs.org>
>         Permanent Failure: Other address status
>         Delivery last attempted at Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:01:45 -0000
> 
> --
> Fedora Core 2, Kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2,  KDE 3.3.1, Xorg 6.7.0
>  21:10:01 up 11 days, 23:54, 21 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.04, 0.06
> It's what you learn after you know it all that counts
> 

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
            - Nemesis Air Racing Team motto


More information about the Linux-users mailing list