Crunch time: Debian, Libranet or FC1?
Michael Hipp
Michael
Mon May 17 12:01:46 PDT 2004
I need to build a new server for a client. Primary app for now will just
be Samba but later PostgreSQL. Hardware will be a P4 with dual SCSI
mirrored. This client is smallish, but they would be out of business in
no time if this system doesn't "just run".
Until now, I always just used the latest version of RHL for a server
distro, but that is all changed. Please offer me your opinions and any
pros/cons you can think of...
- I'm by far more familiar with Red Hat than anything else.
- The stability of Debian is legendary. But some of the software is
ancient and I don't know how stable the unstable repository is. And
security updates are generally unavailable for unstable.
- Libranet is a jewel, but it is not intended as a server distro.
- FC1 is easy, familiar and up to date; but would I be crazy to use it
for a production server (even a small one)?
- Do I just need to bite the bullet and learn Debian?
- Is there any good reason to continue to think of Debian as an
intimidating/difficult distro?
{Here's some unscientific data ... Went down to Books-A-Million in
Little Rock. The book rack for "Operating Systems" had (16) items that
mention Red Hat right in the title and several others that are based on
Red Hat but don't say so in the title, (2) items that have SUSE in the
title and (1) about Debian. Is staying with the "leader" still the best
choice?}
Opinions please ...
Thanks,
Michael
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list