2.6.0 not accepting CC?

[Net Llama!]

On 12/23/03 05:53, Kurt Wall wrote:

> In a 0.7K blaze of typing glory, Net Llama! wrote:
> 
>>I've got a Redhat box with gcc-2.96 and my own gcc-3.2.3.  Calling gcc 
>>will always end up using 2.96.  I've exported CC so that it calls 3.2.3, 
>>however whenever I attempt to build a 2.6.0 kernel, its ignoring CC, and 
>>using gcc instead.  Anyone know if this is a bug, or intentional?
> 
> 
> I don't know if it's a bug or not. Have you tried 
> 
> $ make CC=/path/to/gcc 

Nope, didn't try that.  I wasn't aware that make would accept a CC 
variable.  Even if that does work, this seems like a bug to me, if its 
ignoring CC altogether and has 'gcc' hardcoded.  Thanks though.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                       	       netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: 		    http://netllama.ipfox.com

   7:50am  up 16 days, 12:38,  1 user,  load average: 0.10, 0.09, 0.09