Need Suggestions for Automated Backup
Alma J Wetzker
almaw
Mon May 17 11:56:21 PDT 2004
Chong Yu Meng wrote:
> Hmm... I never thought about the size thing. Didn't factor it in.
>
> I'm not sure about RAID, though -- I'll have to do the sums to see if I
> can build in some redundancy. Which would you suggest ? Mirroring or a
> full RAID-5 array ? I'm thinking now of maybe dumping everything into an
> external hard drive since it's actually cheaper (and faster) than tape.
> But I won't be able to keep many "snapshots" of the data, I imagine.
> Typically, how many days data does a company keep?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> pascal chong
[snip]
When my paycheck (and a LOT of others) depended on things like this, We made
full backups every weekend, month, quarter and year. We kept the full backups
off-site with a company that provided that service. We did incremental
backups daily and kept those in a fireproof safe in the data center. We also
did full backups before and after inventories for auditing purposes. I
imagine how much you keep will depend on your accounting cycle and how much
you want to spend.
Mirroring with RAID (10) is expensive but fast read and write. If that is
what you are thninking, you fracture the mirror, replace a drive and reenable
the mirror. Be prepared for a system stall as the drive is copied. RAID (5)
is about as fast on reads but the writes are much slower. It requires fewer
drives but full backups need to be done on a separate media (another drive,
tape, CD, etc.) Great for data warehouse applications or web sites that don't
collect data on the same drives.
For just backup, I would recomend an external drive. The criticality of the
data should drive when you go to RAID. (How long can the company survive
without access to the data on the system? How long to replace the whole
server? Can the data be corrupted, or just lost? That type stuff should
drive your level of backup.) FWIW
-- Alma
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list