SO 7: importing postscript
Roger Oberholtzer
roger
Mon May 17 11:55:46 PDT 2004
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:59:35 +0100
Klaus-Peter Schrage <kpschrage at gmx.de> wrote:
> Joel Hammer wrote:
> > Well, I do this same sort of thing with convert. (It's part of the
> > imagemagick package.)
> > convert file.ps file.jpg and then import into SO. Works fine and can be
> > scripted. But, I would really like to know why these eps files look fine
> > in gv but so bad in SO.
>
> Bad? Didn't notice that. As a test, I loaded the notorious tiger.ps from
> the ghostscript examples into GSview, converted it to a jpeg of 300 dpi
> and imported this into an OO 1.1 text document - it looked and printed
> fine. Klaus
But shouldn't the postscript import take the encapsulated file directly? If
you convert to jpeg, then you are not testing SO/OO postscript import. You
are testing ghostscript's postscript parsing and SO/OO's jpeg import. Of
course, SO/OO surely call ghostscript anyway. But, do they do so correctly?
Is jpeg the format SO/OO use to store their imported postscript?
--
+????????????????????????????+???????????????????????????????+
? Roger Oberholtzer ? E-mail: roger at opq.se ?
? OPQ Systems AB ? WWW: http://www.opq.se/ ?
? Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 ? Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 ?
? 115 34 Stockholm ? Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ?
? Sweden ? Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 ?
+????????????????????????????+???????????????????????????????+
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list