SO 7: importing postscript

Roger Oberholtzer roger
Mon May 17 11:55:46 PDT 2004


On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:59:35 +0100
Klaus-Peter Schrage <kpschrage at gmx.de> wrote:

> Joel Hammer wrote:
> > Well, I do this same sort of thing with convert. (It's part of the
> > imagemagick package.)
> > convert file.ps file.jpg and then import into SO. Works fine and can be
> > scripted. But, I would really like to know why these eps files look fine
> > in gv but so bad in SO.
> 
> Bad? Didn't notice that. As a test, I loaded the notorious tiger.ps from 
> the ghostscript examples into GSview, converted it to a jpeg of 300 dpi 
> and imported this into an OO 1.1 text document - it looked and printed
> fine. Klaus

But shouldn't the postscript import take the encapsulated file directly? If
you convert to jpeg, then you are not testing SO/OO postscript import. You
are testing ghostscript's postscript parsing and SO/OO's jpeg import. Of
course, SO/OO surely call ghostscript anyway. But, do they do so correctly?
Is jpeg the format SO/OO use to store their imported postscript?


-- 
+????????????????????????????+???????????????????????????????+
? Roger Oberholtzer          ?   E-mail: roger at opq.se        ?
? OPQ Systems AB             ?      WWW: http://www.opq.se/  ?
? Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  ?    Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 ?
? 115 34 Stockholm           ?   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 ?
? Sweden                     ?      Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 ?
+????????????????????????????+???????????????????????????????+



More information about the Linux-users mailing list