spamassassin's sa-learn

Tim Wunder tim
Mon May 17 11:55:41 PDT 2004


On 11/14/2003 8:34 AM, I believe that Michael Hipp wrote:

> M.W. Chang wrote:
> 
>> It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than
>> SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while
>> mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on reception.
> 
> 
> I've been using Moz Firebird as my only email for quite some time now. 

You have? How did you get the stand alone browser product to do e-mail?

Perhaps you mean Thunderbird. ;-)

> And have been somewhat disappointed in the filters. It catches alot of 
> the junk right away, but it doesn't seem to be learning. I get the same 
> spam from the same scammers every day and no matter how many times I 
> flag it as junk it continues to show up. But it is a 0.7 Beta so I don't 
> want to be critical of it, just hope they flesh it out in the near future.

FWIW, Mozilla's intergrated MUA is still better than the stand alone 
Thunderbird. I suspect it's gonna take longer than they originally 
thought to get it up to speed.

Tim



More information about the Linux-users mailing list