from an sco press release today

[Joel Hammer]

Actually, it was worse. It seems they asked for recounts without any
clear criteria for recounting ballots. That was the famous hanging chad
debate.  That was what the Supremes declared unconstitutional. Which
is surprising, because I would have thought a compelling need to elect
a Democrat would have outweighed the concept of equal protection under
the law, but, dear me, this is getting OT.

Of course, many people forget that GB won every recount, machine and
manual, including one done by the media after the election. How soon
they forget. 

Joel

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:27:30PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:13:12 -0400
> dep <dep at linuxandmain.com> wrote:
> 
> > that having been said, i have every confidence in the ability of david boies
> > to do for sco what he did for algore.
>  
> Excuse me?  I thought the only thing he did for algore was to push him to
> questionable election practices (recounting only certain districts) that the
> Supremes had to resolve. 
> 
> -- 
> Collins Richey - Denver Area
> if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
> worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users at mail.linux-sxs.org
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://mail.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users