SUSE vs Knoppix

[Net Llama!]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
> Net Llama! <netllama at linux-sxs.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote:
> > > I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
> > > documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably
> > > ok with it.
> > > I have read a lot  of favourable press recently about knoppix and
> > > wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
> > > advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
> >
> > KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE.  I love KNOPPIX for recovery
> > purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis.  The entire
> > religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry combined with what i feel is completely
> > stupid packaging give me a bad taste in my mouth from Debian.  I'm a huge
> > Redhat fan, although i know some others on this list are not.
> >
>
> Just curious.  Has Redhat ever given up the philosophy "it's a new version, it
> must be ready for prime time"?  I know they have released less than reliable
> versions in the past.  Example, there is a new version of GCC that breaks a lot
> of packages.  Is Redhat storming ahead with this like they did a couple of years
> ago?

No.



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com