ADMIN: rsync access restricted
Roger Oberholtzer
roger
Mon May 17 11:53:14 PDT 2004
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:46, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> >On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 05:38, Bill Campbell wrote:
> ...
> >> There's no relationship between rsync and the berserkely ``r'' commands
> >> beyond the first letter of the name.
> >
> >I thought (possibly incorrectly): rsync uses rsh on the client side to
> >do the actual talking to the server. Try running rsync without rsh
> >installed. And it expects rshd on the server side. You 'could' also run
> >an rsyncd instead of a rshd on the server side, but us clients would be
> >connecting on a different port (873). As we are not doing do, we are
> >talking to your rshd. All rather Berkeley.
>
> ``rsync -e ssh ...'' uses secure shell for the transport.
Is anyone doing this to sync the sxs?
> We often use rsync in server mode which has its own server for things like
> updating djbdns data files on backup DNS servers where each domain master
> has its own entry in the rsyncd.conf file restricting access to one
> directory, and to the IP address (or CIDR block) of the updating server.
Which is the way things should be. But rsync 'out of the box' and using
the command lines I have seen in sxs update scripts use none of this.
I just installed SuSE on a laptop and wanted to rsync to it. That is
when I discovered that the rsync daemon was not relevant, in favor of
rshd.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list