Redhat 9's great, RPM not so
Collins Richey
erichey2
Mon May 17 11:51:49 PDT 2004
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:33:13 +0200
Roger Oberholtzer <roger at opq.se> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:50:44 -0400
> "Robert E. Raymond" <rraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > > Have you tried kportage?
> >
> > I have. Again, not enough like Windows Update in the Ease of Use
> > department...
>
> A little button running 'emerge -Uu system' and 'emerge -Uu world'?
>
> The only problem is that new config files need to be dealt with by
> hand. Of course, if you always use defaults, even this can be handled
> by emerge.
>
> But, I get your point.
>
> > Redhat's nice in that it's got the 'RedHat update utility' for
> > getting security updates... as long as I put a web browser, office
> > suite, and DVD player on that doesn't crash he should be happy...
> > not everyone needs the latest versions ;)
>
> Similar with SuSE. I guess most serious distros have this feature.
>
Having run RH7.3 for a while and having used up2date, I must agree with
you. Of the mega distros, I like RedHat best. I gave up on RH simply
because I couldn't find compatible packages for a lot of the toys I
wanted to play with. For unsophisticated users, RH is a good choice.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list