WeLoveTheSCOInformationMinister
Alma J Wetzker
almaw
Mon May 17 11:51:40 PDT 2004
Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks.com> Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:49:26 -0400
> Quoth Alma J Wetzker:
>
>>Ken Moffat <kmoffat at drizzle.com> Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:42:56 -0700
>>>I guess I just don't see how sco can even think of suing
>>>when they have released distros under the gpl. It defies logic!
>>
>>Not at all. SCO's premise is that the GPL is invalid. This is a
>>perfect demonstration of the difference between reasoning logically and
>>reasoning correctly.
>
> Maybe it's just my day to be dense, but I'm not seeing much difference
> between reasoning logically and reasoning correctly. And certainly not
> when applied to SCO's current course of action, which is neither
> reasonable, logical, nor correct.
>
> Kurt
Your point is quite apt, Kurt. SCO has changed the initial assumptions
and the laws of cause and effect in their world. Thereby making their
arguments very logical and reasonable. Those changes are manditory if
logic is to be satisfied. The simple fact that it is crazy to make the
assumptions they are making hasn't penetrated yet. Their world may
deflate entirely before it does, if ever.
-- Alma
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list