WeLoveTheSCOInformationMinister

Kurt Wall kwall
Mon May 17 11:51:38 PDT 2004


Quoth Alma J Wetzker:
> Ken Moffat <kmoffat at drizzle.com> Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:42:56 -0700
> >Tony Alfrey wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Why, send in your licensing fee to SCO for all the stolen IP stuff
> >>>you have in your linux boxen, and I'm sure they'll get right back to
> >>>you. <grin>
> >>
> >>Jeeze (slap to head), why didn't I think of that?  I'll get my 
> >>checkbook out right now.
> >
> >I guess I just don't see how sco can even think of suing
> >when they have released distros under the gpl. It defies logic!
> 
> Not at all.  SCO's premise is that the GPL is invalid.  This is a 
> perfect demonstration of the difference between reasoning logically and 
> reasoning correctly.

Maybe it's just my day to be dense, but I'm not seeing much difference
between reasoning logically and reasoning correctly. And certainly not
when applied to SCO's current course of action, which is neither
reasonable, logical, nor correct.

Kurt
-- 
"Speed is subsittute fo accurancy."


More information about the Linux-users mailing list