SCO fizzles

[Alma J Wetzker]

> burns <linux at burnsmacdonald.com> 24 Aug 2003 20:14:38 -0400
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:02, Alma J Wetzker wrote:
>My guess is that they are not as involved as we would like to believe. 
>>Much as SCO's blathering is to the benefit of M$, I don't think they are 
>>orchestrating it.  Sun is also a backer of SCO with _LOTS_ to lose if 
>>linux catches on.  Remember that Caldera was birthed by a lawsuit with 
>>M$ over DR-DOS not working with Windoze.  (They won for big bucks.)
>>
> I just can't see where logic would lead you to believe that Sun is more
> likely than MS to be in cahoots with SCO. The available indications,
> albeit circumstantial, point in exactly the opposite direction.

Sloppy language, sorry.  I really don't think either company is involved 
other than giving $$$ to SCO.  To me it looks like the razor cuts to 
SCO's arrogance and stupidity without any help from an outside source. 
(Other than cheers.)

     -- Alma