SCO fizzles

[Bob Hemus]

Collins Richey wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:42:54 -0400
>Kurt Wall <kwall at kurtwerks.com> wrote:
>
>>Quoth Joel Hammer:
>>
>>>Do you think SCO is pulling a typical lawyers trick? Trying to
>>>pollute the jury pool? Anybody who is remotely aware of technical
>>>issues will hear all about these issues long before the trial, thus
>>>making them ineligible for the jury.
>>>
>>Maybe. But I can't honestly say I understand *what* they're doing.
>>I'm not even confident *SCO* knows what they're doing.
>>
>
>I'm confident that *SCO* doesn't know WTF they're doing! 
>

>     No one with an
>
>
>     iota of sense would take on IBM and their team of lawyers.
>
>
A month ago I made the same comment, sorta.

I've got a friend who worked for AT&T maybe 20 years ago until fairly 
recently.  When the Govt. went after them they sent 5 trainlosads of 
"paper" to 'em.  While the individual jerks at M$ have money, I bet the 
pockets of IBM are deeper than the M$ company's.  Microsloth may, even, 
have to sell or make more stock to sell to keep this thing alive.  As 
someone said "follow the money" if it's worth it, IBM has the money. 
Money buys attorneys.  Let's all hope IBM stays with it.  I'm old and 
wise enough to realize right doesn't always win!
Bob