SCO fizzles
Tom Marinis
tmarinis99
Mon May 17 11:51:21 PDT 2004
Kurt Wall wrote:
> Quoth Alma J Wetzker:
>
>>>Joel Hammer <Joel at hammershome.com> Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:50:19 -0400
>>>
>>>Yes, but what will the jury think?
>>>Joel
>>>
>>>On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:21:49PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/smoking-fizzle.html
>>
>>That is the $3,000,000,000.00 question. It is a VERY safe bet that SCO
>>will remove any juror that uses a computer, let alone can read code. So
>>it all comes down to which expert witness is prettier.
>
>
> Which pretty much removes ESR and RMS from the running. :-) That
> said, self-promotion notwithstanding, ESR is very good at making
> complex technical issues clear. However, this is not about complex
> _technical_ issues, but, rather, about IBM's alleged contract
> violoations. SCOs trial-by-press-release is calcualated attempt
> to cloud the core legal issue: did IBM subvert the contract or not?
>
> Kurt
Aww Kurt, you and Lonnie just had to open your mouths...
http://newsforge.com/newsforge/03/08/22/1746248.shtml?tid=19
Well, now you both done it !
So, I guess when ESR goes to court, the sxs.org group
led by Mr. A. Mathews will force you both
to shave his legs for his court appearance when he testifies....
[ I can't do it, I still wanna live. The mere visualization
of that event makes me wanna hurl... ]
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list