sco's lastest blathering

[burns]

On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:21, Tom Wilson wrote:
> LMFAO. Found the link on /.  I don't even know what to say about this
> one because it is so far fetched.  
> 
> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11031

I know what we should say.

No reasonable person who knows anything about the industry and/or Linux
would ever doubt, given the whole pattern of what SCO is doing, that MS
is not behind this at the strategic level. Where there is smoke, there's
usually fire and in this case the smoke is billowing. 

What is required is for the government to launch an immediate
investigation to see if Microsoft is indeed behind this. If they find
that it is, not only does it raise the most serious instances yet of
antitrust and tampering, it also could/should result in criminal charges
against top MS executives if sufficient evidence was found.
Unfortunately, the current US administration has already demonstrated
that they are not willing to do anything to keep MS in line - and on the
basis of what certainly seems to be a well-orchestrated campaign, it
appears that Bill knows it too.
-- 
burns