FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

[Jerry McBride]

It makes you wonder what reiser4 isn't doing that reiser is.. :')

I'm joking...

As for ext3 being faster that xfs... hmmm... Not surprised.


On Friday 08 August 2003 09:20 am, Collins Richey wrote:
> Interesting article and lots of critiques at
>
> 	http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/715
>
> The following extract shows the basic differences.  This is German
> number notation with commas and periods reversed.
>
>              reiser4       reiserfs       ext3           XFS         JFS
> copy     33.39,34%  39.55,32%  39.42,25%  43.50,32%  48.15,20%
> sync        1.54,00%   3.15,10%   9.05,00%    2.08,10%    3.05,10%
> recopy1  31.09,34%  75.15,13%  79.96, 9% 102.37,12% 108.39, 5%
> recopy2  33.15,33%  77.62,13%  98.84, 7% 108.00,12% 114.96, 5%
> sync      2.89, 3%   3.84, 1%   8.15, 0%   2.40, 2%   3.86, 0%
> du        2.05,42%   2.46,21%   3.31,11%   3.73,32%   2.42,17%
> delete    7.41,52%   5.22,58%   3.71,39%   8.75,56%  15.33, 7%
> tar      52.25,25%  90.83,12%  74.93,13% 157.61, 7% 135.86, 6%
> sync      6.77, 2%   4.19, 3%   1.67, 1%   0.95, 1%  38.18, 0%
> overall 171.28,30% 302.53,16% 319.71,11% 429.79,13% 470.88, 6%
>
> In general, reiser4 looks to be a real winner (when it's out of
> development, of course), and my favorite EXT3 and everyone else's
> favorite XFS are among the slowest.

-- 

******************************************************************************
                     Registered Linux User Number 185956
          http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
             Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
This email account no longers accepts attachments or messages containing html.
     7:45pm  up 29 days,  5:43,  4 users,  load average: 1.03, 1.20, 1.29