SCO Sucks

[Matthew Carpenter]

Any judge in their right mind will be able to see through this.  Politics
aside, the judge would have to concede that SCO's tactics have been completely
self-serving and not in accord with a desire to resolve anything.  Since the
code is already public, listing code that has been allegedly infringed upon
would not in any way further any possible damages.  No, this is SCO's attempts
to make money off of Linux since they were unable to do so using more
conventional means (ie. SELLING IT!)



On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:16:39 +0200
Roger Oberholtzer <roger at opq.se> wrote:

> 
> The problem is that as soon as SCO make public which code is effected (if
> any), it will be reimplemented. Making the need for a license go away.


-- 
Matthew Carpenter 
matt at eisgr.com                          http://www.eisgr.com/

Enterprise Information Systems
* Network Service Appliances
* Network Consulting, Integration & Support
* Web Integration and E-Business