rpm install

[Tim Wunder]

On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > > At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
> > > rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
> > > package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
> > > rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.rpm after
> > > installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot

"it"? What is telling you that gtk+ is not installed. rpm? Well, that's 
because the package is called gtk+2.0, not gtk+. Try rpm -q gtk+2.0.

> > > find any of its libs etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ?

FWIW, locate will only find new files after it's database hase been updated 
via updatedb, but you knew that...

> >
> > A bit of each  :)
> >
> > try:
> > rpm -qa | grep gtk+
>
> Right, this is the result:
>
> [root at optusnet kantoine]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+
> gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
> libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
> libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
> libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk
> libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
> gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk
> libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
> libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
> libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
> libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.2-4mdk
> libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk

You seem to have two versions of libgtk+2.0_0-devel installed. Don't know if 
that matters, but I'd try removing the two and installing only one.

HTH, 
Tim

-- 
RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-18.8,  KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1
 10:20am  up 41 days, 11:13,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.05, 0.06
Help! I'm addicted to Klickety!