What was it about eD 2.4?
Michael Scottaline
nbhs2
Mon May 17 11:50:23 PDT 2004
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:05:05 +1000
Keith Antoine <kantoine at optusnet.com.au> insightfully noted:
>On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 04:40 am, Shawn L Johnston wrote:
>> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 12:49, Tina M Berendt wrote:
>> > So, what *specifically* made eD so great?
>>
>> It was elegant, from installation to end use.
>>
>> Shawn
>
>Yes, that describes it souciently. Plus maintenance was so easy it did not
>matter, rpm or tarball it went up and worked. The lousy rpm dependency issue
>I have these days was not around or very minor. In fact one could abuse
>thesystem and get away with it within reason.
====================================
AND......, a superlative user mail list; many are now here, but also Les, Mike
Andrews and others.....
Mike
--
"The man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30
years of his life"
--Muhammad Ali
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list