spam issues

[Bill Davidson]

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0400
Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org> wrote:


>  From an end user perspective, I've found Mozilla's junk mail
>  filtering 
> to be fantastic at determining what's junk and what's not. Much better
> 
> than plain SpamAssassin. Although, current SpamAssassin is supposed to
> 
> be able to do Bayesian analysis, it's not nearly as user friendly as 
> using Mozilla Mail. But for KMail's superiority in handling mailing 
> lists, I'd have moved my home e-mail to Mozilla already.
> 
> I had found a link that described how to automate the use of 
> SpamAssassin's Bayesian filtering, but I haven't actually tried it
> yet.<off to google "spamassasin bayesian filter>
> here it is:
> http://spamassassin.rediris.es/doc/sa-learn.html

I've been using popfile for a while and it works great. It also uses
Bayesian filtering.
http://popfile.sourceforge.net/

Bill