my networking problem is over
Collins Richey
erichey2
Mon May 17 11:49:51 PDT 2004
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:56:37 -0500
"David A. Bandel" <david at pananix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:37:25 -0400
> Keith Antoine <kantoine at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > I do not know what i did differently, obviously something but I am
> > now
> >
> > connected with both XP and linux, plus the secondary machine is now
> > also online. So my major problem is now solved. What can I do next
> > to keep everyone busy, I know i'll do a 2.6 compile.
> >
> > All jokes aside many thanks to all those who put in their .05 cents
> > worth.
>
> It's not the compilation that will get you, but the little things that
> you will forget to include or include as modules. In that respect,
> 2.6 is a nightmare. It's getting to the point that not just anyone
> can compile their own kernel and expect it to work. The config script
> needs simplification.
>
At least they got rid of the make mrproper and make deps stuff. IMO,
that's a very positive step. If you screw something up, change the
config and remake, it's very quick.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list