So do I need to start learning SuSE?
Bruce Marshall
bmarsh
Mon May 17 11:49:44 PDT 2004
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 6:37 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 11:41 am, Bill Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:00:35AM -0400, Net Llama! wrote:
> > >On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> > >> I'm not quite sure I follow the logic in the last sentence. But
> > >> I would tell
> > >
> > >How so?
> > >
> > >> Michael to learn SuSE. It's a breath of fresh air over RH and
> > >> MDK. It pleases even an old COL-er
> >
> > Me too!
> >
> > >That's not been my experience. My use of SuSE has been nothing but
> > >frustration. It looks like they hacked up the distro just enough
> > > to make it different & confusing. But, have fun if you like it.
> >
> > That's largely changed with SuSE 8.x. No longer does it depend on a
> > monster, monolithic configuration file (e.g. you can manually edit
> > configuration files and they stay changed after running yast2).
>
> Not so AFAIAC its still a dog.
I agree with Matt... but let's not start the 'OS wars'.
I am able to edit any damn config files I want (I think I've been using
the same httpd.conf for the last 4 releases and all SuSE ever does about
it is to tell me that 'you've modified httpd.conf and you'll find my
file in /<path>/httpd.conf.SuSE". It doesn't touch anything that's
been modified.
<zinger alert>
I've never met a RH release that I liked. (and there have been about 3
different ones.)
</zinger alert)
--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh at bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 07/22/03
16:44 +
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"I just got skylights put in my place. The people who live above me
are furious."
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list