gcc-2.9x & gcc-3.3x peacfully coinciding?

[Net Llama!]

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Quoth Net Llama!:
> > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
> > > > Is there any reason to keep the old version of gcc around, other than for
> > > > the random stuff that still won't buld right on gcc-3.x?
> > >
> > > I'd keep it around until you're sure the new one works.
> >
> > Do you know of a list of stuff that is known not to build with gcc-3.x?
>
> The kernel doesn't usually build with 3.3. I'm not aware of anything
> else, but I just started playing with it.

Does the kernel build with 3.2?  Is there anything that runs much
faster/better when built with gcc-3.x?

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com