gcc-2.9x & gcc-3.3x peacfully coinciding?

[Net Llama!]

On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
> > Is there any reason to keep the old version of gcc around, other than for
> > the random stuff that still won't buld right on gcc-3.x?
>
> I'd keep it around until you're sure the new one works.

Do you know of a list of stuff that is known not to build with gcc-3.x?

> <plug mode="shameless">
> If all else fails, see http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=187
> when it comes out. ;-)
> </plug>

I don't suppose it will be out later this afternoon, will it? ;)

thanks Kurt.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com