gcc-2.9x & gcc-3.3x peacfully coinciding?
Bill Campbell
linux-sxs
Mon May 17 11:49:04 PDT 2004
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:05:43PM -0400, Net Llama! wrote:
...
>Is it glaringly obvious when something isn't able to be built with
>gcc-3.x? Does the build just fail, or is there a chance that i could get
>a broken binary?
In my experience t's always resulted in a failed build.
Bill
--
INTERNET: bill at Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/
``Virtually everything is under federal control nowadays except the
federal budget.''
-- Herman E. Talmadge, 1975
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list