gcc-2.9x & gcc-3.3x peacfully coinciding?

Bill Campbell linux-sxs
Mon May 17 11:49:04 PDT 2004


On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:05:43PM -0400, Net Llama! wrote:
...
>Is it glaringly obvious when something isn't able to be built with
>gcc-3.x?  Does the build just fail, or is there a chance that i could get
>a broken binary?

In my experience t's always resulted in a failed build.

Bill
--
INTERNET:   bill at Celestial.COM  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:               camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:            (206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

``Virtually everything is under federal control nowadays except the
federal budget.''
    -- Herman E. Talmadge, 1975


More information about the Linux-users mailing list