Blame [OT]

ronnie gauthier ronnieg
Mon May 17 11:48:55 PDT 2004


On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:37:01 -0400 - Tim Wunder <tim at thewunders.org> wrote the
following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]

>On 7/2/2003 1:50 PM, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote:
><snip-a-roo>
>
>I believe Vern has a point here. This thread started OT, had *nothing* 
>remotely to do with linux, and should've been started on general. That's 
>Tom Condon's fault. Dunno if he's sub'd to general or not, but his 
>origianl post shoulda gone there. As should have any of our replies.
>

I dont agree one bit.

The only list without OT posts is a moderated list. This is a well run list and
Doug does a great job at moderating and kicking OT's to the general list if
needed. OT posts are what make the list has personalities instead of just
handles that supply answers. OT posts let people unwind and crack jokes. Just
like any social gathering, nothing stays on topic, its how the topic changes are
handled that dictate the success of the gathering. And you know, or should know,
the history of OT posts here which either quickly run their course or get kicked
to general. That, IMHO, is what makes this list better than others of the same
catagory.




More information about the Linux-users mailing list