SCO vs. ...

[Collins Richey]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:24:51 -0400
dep <dep at linuxandmain.com> wrote:

> begin  David A. Bandel's  quote:
> 
> | Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and AT&T at the same time
> | in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$.  And SCO's not even
> | close to that big.
> 
> my guess was that on about wednesday novell would announce that, 
> actually, it had kept the ibm stuff, so sco was without standing 
> there, too.
> 
> | SCO reminds me more and more of the little mouse trying to suck an
> | elephant through a straw.
> 
> my sense is that the rodent and suck parts are plenty accurate.
> 
> i still believe that the rule for the plaintiff's bar should be this: 
> lose, and the minute the jury so pronounces the lawyer is taken away 
> to serve the sum of the amount sought and the legal expenses of the 
> defense, both in a maximum security prison and redeemed at minimum 
> wage, no overtime. this is the kind of tort reform that everyone who 
> is not a member of the american trial lawyer association can live 
> with.
> -- 

Yeah, but that's unfortunately a dream world.  I just hope the mouse
gets stepped on hard really soon so we (I'm thinking worldwide) can get
back to wasting bandwidth on something more productive.


-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.