Linux 2.4.21

Kurt Wall kwall
Mon May 17 11:48:24 PDT 2004


Quoth Net Llama!:
> On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> 
> >On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> >>On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote:
> >>>> Maybe it's not cooked yet.
> >>>
> >>> The patch didn?t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I didn?t
> >>> even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so rejects
> >>> and way to much fuzz...
> >>
> >>huh?  the only discrepancy that i got was:
> >>patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> >>Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines).
> >>patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >>
> >>
> >>other than that it was smooth sailing.
> >
> >I didn't even get that error.
> 
> hrmmmm...are you using a full 2.4.21 tarball, or just the patchset 
> tarball?  I'm using the full tarball, downloaded early yesterday 
> morning.  i'm starting to wonder if what got dumped out to the world was 
> changed at some point.

I?m using 2.4.19 + patch to 2.4.20 + patch to 2.4.21.

Kurt
-- 
What this world needs is a good five-dollar plasma weapon.


More information about the Linux-users mailing list