Linux 2.4.21

[Bruce Marshall]

On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:24 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> >> On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote:
> >> >> Maybe it's not cooked yet.
> >> >
> >> > The patch didn?t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I
> >> > didn?t even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so
> >> > rejects and way to much fuzz...
> >>
> >> huh?  the only discrepancy that i got was:
> >> patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines).
> >> patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
> >>
> >>
> >> other than that it was smooth sailing.
> >
> > I didn't even get that error.
>
> hrmmmm...are you using a full 2.4.21 tarball, or just the patchset
> tarball?  I'm using the full tarball, downloaded early yesterday
> morning.  i'm starting to wonder if what got dumped out to the world
> was changed at some point.

Using a full tarball.


-- 
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ Bruce S. Marshall  bmarsh at bmarsh.com  Bellaire, MI         06/14/03 
12:05  +
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory."