RHL 9 (wasRe: Router Gateway webserver Samba server)

[Net Llama!]

On Thu, 1 May 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On 4/30/2003 11:46 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
> <snip>
> >  I recommend RH9...
>
> Really?
> May I ask why?
> I've been happily running RHL 8.0 for a while now (since my hardware
> issues have been mostly cleared up, RHL 8.0 has been rather good for
> me), but have been heavily considering an upgrade to RHL 9.

I skipped RH8 after hearing some nightmare stories about broken rpm and
other stuff.

> What is it that you find most appealing?

Seems to be well designed, no noticable instability, and its redhat.
There's really not any one specific thing, it just feels right, after
moving from 7.3.

> Are you running XFCE with it, or Gnome (I'm assuming you're not running
> KDE...)?

XFCE4

> Or are you running it primarily as a server?

At this point, its installed on a single laptop, however i'll prolly start
deploying it as a server (with XFS) in a month or 2 if all continues to
run smoothly.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com