disk fun

stayler stayler
Mon May 17 11:44:41 PDT 2004


On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:10:46 +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

>Interesting. I wonder what the most and least efficient linux fs is for
>many small files. In some of my data collection systems, this is a common
>file type. Others will have this and some files that are quite large. But
>never as many very large files.

hpfs used a 512 byte cluster size......



More information about the Linux-users mailing list