updating openssl
Net Llama!
netllama
Mon May 17 11:42:46 PDT 2004
The "symlink method" doesn't always work for everything.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, m.w.chang wrote:
>
> that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl?
> doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while...
>
> > Building static binaries should be avoided unless you have a really good
> > reason. They're an order of magnitude larger, and less efficient. I
> > wouldn't consider openssl a good reason.
>
>
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list