updating openssl

Net Llama! netllama
Mon May 17 11:42:46 PDT 2004


The "symlink method" doesn't always work for everything.

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, m.w.chang wrote:

>
> that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl?
> doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while...
>
> > Building static binaries should be avoided unless you have a really good
> > reason.  They're an order of magnitude larger, and less efficient.  I
> > wouldn't consider openssl a good reason.
>
>
>

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com


More information about the Linux-users mailing list