updating openssl

[m.w.chang]

that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl?
doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while...

> Building static binaries should be avoided unless you have a really good 
> reason.  They're an order of magnitude larger, and less efficient.  I 
> wouldn't consider openssl a good reason.


-- 
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly.  .~.   In Linux We Trust.
news://news.hkpcug.org        / v \  http://www.linux-sxs.org
news://news.linux.org.hk     /( _ )\ http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
                               ^ ^   http://beyond.linuxfromscratch.org
For starters: http://new.linuxnow.com/tutorial/preface.html