another small problem with networking
Jerry McBride
mcbrides9
Mon May 17 11:42:43 PDT 2004
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 14:16:22 +1000 Keith Antoine <kantoine at bigpond.net.au>
wrote:
> I have a friend that has a linux box (mandrake9.0) and an XP plus a ME
> connected. We can get it to the stage where we can ping from
> 192.168.0.1 to either of the others (3 & 4) and from them to 1 or 2.
> We have 2 inet cards installed in the linux box. However we cannot get to
> the net from either of the windows boxes. Forwarding is active, tried
> masquerade and it locked it up tight.
> Have one cable that does not work at all, it has to be a crossover cable ;
> right?
>
All connections into the hub should be straight through cables, including the
server. The only exception is that if you stack hubs, some of them won't have an
expansion port and you'll need a cross over cable. The cable connection from the
server to the inet would depend on how you're getting your inet feed. If it's
over a cable via a cable modem, some use a cross over cable, some use
straight... it depends on what your provider gave you. Your server has two
nic's, one for internet connection, the other feeding into a hub/switch box,
then you should run a firewall script the enables masquerading. That locking up
you mentioned, Did you modify a firewall script for your setup? It could be you
entered a host name incorrectly and iptables/ipchains is waiting to timeout
before it moves on to the next line in your firewall script.
For instance, if I re-run my firewall script when my ISP's smtp server is
off-line, the script will hang there until it times out and then continues on as
normal.
--
******************************************************************************
Registered Linux User Number 185956
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
11:28pm up 43 days, 1:07, 10 users, load average: 1.28, 1.34, 1.27
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list