Coolpix 2500: Update

[Bill Campbell]

On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:06:20PM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
>On Wednesday 01 January 2003 13:34 pm, Collins wrote:
...
>> Picture quality is rated excellent by consumer reports, but how much
>> of a problem is the fact that there is no viewfinder, just the
>> display?
>
>No problem that I've found.   Might be a problem in real low-light 
>conditions where the display might not show enough.

The biggest problem I've found isn't low light, but bright light outdoors
which made the display basically unreadable.  I wanted a hood similar to
that used on old plate film cameras.

Bill
--
INTERNET:   bill at Celestial.COM  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:               camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:            (206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

``Anyone who thinks Microsoft never does anything truly innovative isn't
paying attention to the part of the company that pushes the state of
its art: Microsoft's legal department.'' 
   --Ed Foster, InfoWorld Gripe Line columnist