Maybe my kernel will work - log files
Aaron Grewell
agrewell
Mon May 17 11:42:21 PDT 2004
Oops, read failure on my part. You should be able to open the Makefile
and find the KERNELRELEASE= line. Look at the variables and see what's
there. I suspect you may find that EXTRAVERSION has been modified by
your previous kernel patch. Since patch didn't find what it expected (a
blank entry for EXTRAVERSION) it wouldn't apply the hunk. You may want
to add "-xfs" at the end of whatever's already there, or not. Your
choice. This stuff is purely cosmetic, to allow you to label your own
kernel in whatever way you please. In short, this should not harm the
compile. Go for it.
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:21, Bonez wrote:
> My kernel source is in /home/scott/kernel/linux-2.4.20.
>
> I copied the xfs patch file to that directory, and when running it with -p1
> the following .log file was generated with one solitary hunk failure. I read
> the Makefile.rej and can't see what failed with it.
>
> Here it is:
>
> ***************
> *** 1,7 ****
> VERSION = 2
> PATCHLEVEL = 4
> SUBLEVEL = 20
> - EXTRAVERSION =
>
> KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION)
>
> --- 1,7 ----
> VERSION = 2
> PATCHLEVEL = 4
> SUBLEVEL = 20
> + EXTRAVERSION = -xfs
>
> KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION)
>
>
> Other than the above, the log file indicates everything went as planned, with
> no other failure notices.
>
> Scott
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users at linux-sxs.org
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list