Mozilla mystery (partially solved)
Tim Wunder
tim
Mon May 17 11:42:11 PDT 2004
On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:46 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:21 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > > This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and ran
> > > > strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
> > > >
> > > > A lengthy analysis of a good strace (collins) and a failure (new)
> > > > indicated differences in handling the ~/.fonts.cache-1 file. I tried
> > > > rm'ing the file and tried again, but no joy. Next I copied over the
> > > > /home/collins/.fonts.cache-1 file, and now mozilla will start.
> > > >
> > > > This could be an XFree problem (?). Now that a usable
> > > > ~/.fonts-cache-1 file is present, the warning messages I got from
> > > > xfce have disappeared as well. Does anyone know which packaged
> > > > generates the .fonts.cache-1 file so that I could investigate
> > > > further?
> > >
> > > No such file exists in Redhat. Perhaps this is something specific to
> > > Gentoo?
> >
> > I have a .fonts-cache-1 file in my RH8.0 home directory, and all my
> > users' homes as well...
>
> Hrmmm...perhaps its an 8.0 thing? I can't find it on my 7.3, 7.2, 7.1 or
> 6.2 boxes.
Perhaps. There's nothing of the sort on my RH 7.0 and Suse 8.1 boxen at
work...
--
RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, Gnome 2.x, Xfree86 4.2.0
7:00am up 17:04, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list