ext2->ext3
Bill Campbell
bill
Mon May 17 11:41:58 PDT 2004
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:04:31PM -0500, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
>How many stock bootloaders like XFS these days? That's been one of the
>bigger problems with switching filesystems in the past. I'd have to have
>an older boot partition and store data on the new FS... Which still causes
>problems since the system and config is not on the super-duper filesystem.
>And I'm sorry, but I am still of the opinion that for my purposes I am
>better off using as much distro-stock as possible.
We normally set up a separate 100MB ext2 file system for /boot that's
shared by grub between multple bootable installed systems. We started
doing this as a way to insure that /boot was below the 1024 sector limit,
and it's proven to have other advantages as well. I know 100MB is far more
than is necessary, but then who would need more than 64k of RAM in a
computer?
+ The /boot partion can be normally mounted read-only, minimizing the
possiblities of accidental damage.
+ It doesn't take long to run fsck on the /boot partition, which is rare
in any case as it's usually mounted read-only.
+ If I'm testing a new install and don't tell it about the /boot
partition, it can't clobber the working setup. A bit of minor editing
of /etc/fstab and the real /boot/grub/menu.lst makes the new system
available.
+ It's very easy to backup and restore the boot info if necessary.
+ It's not important what type of file system the booted system's using
so long as the booted kernel understands it.
Bill
--
INTERNET: bill at Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/
``If we got one-tenth of what was promised to us in these acceptance
speeches there wouldn't be any inducement to go to heaven.''
Will Rogers
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list