upgarding to glibc-2.2.5

[Net Llama!]

That someone was me, and that was an anomaly of some sort.  I've never had
problems outside of that one box.

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
> in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
> symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear
> all symlinks before buidling glibc?
>
> my last trial (on a fresh-install COL 3.1) was a failure.I could't
> compile a thing after the upgrade procedure.
>
> Net Llama! wrote:
> > Backup /lib before you start.  If it all goes to hell, make sure you
> > have something like Knoppix or the Linuxcare BBC ready so you can
> > restore /lib.
> > or that plan will work too.  Just /lib needs to be restored.
> >
>
>

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com