Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes

[Joel Hammer]

Thanks. mkisofs -J worked just as advertised, at least on windows98.

I haven't been using this software long (cdrecord, mkisofs), but, it's
really a pleasure to have a command line to burn CD's. Point and click
stuff is just too aggravating.

Does xcdroast offer any advantages?

Joel


Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:52:57PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
> RR & Joliet are both supported via the kernel in linux.  So, as long as
> you have kernel support (and most do from the distro vendors) you should
> be fine.  I can't comment on windoze, i don't use it.
> 
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
> 
> > I want to burn CD's that can be used by non-linux OS's
> > (win95/98/2000/XP).
> >
> > I only have win98 available with which to fool. I burned a CD with the
> > Rock Ridge scheme (mkisofs -r), and that worked fine for linux but the
> > win98 machine shows only the 8.3 names. (If I put the CD into the linux
> > box, and share it with samba, the win98 machine sees the full name.)
> >
> > So, it seems I may need the Joliet naming convention, at least for my
> > version of windows98.
> >
> > Will using the Joliet scheme cause difficulties with other flavors of
> > windows or with linux?