gentoo again
Roger Oberholtzer
roger
Mon May 17 11:41:13 PDT 2004
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 07:25:12 -0800
Ted Ozolins <ted1 at telus.net> wrote:
?
>
> A while back there was a post on the gentoo mail list that a fonts dir
> location was missing in X and had to be edited. I can not remember exactly
>
> what that was. A search of gentoo lists should get you that info. I'll
> look for it later and if I locate that post I'll forward it to you. I had
> to add the resolutions to my XF86Config after configuring X which I
> thought was rather odd. We must keep in mind that it is a release
> candidate so there is bound to be a couple of glitches along the way.
What suprised me about that was what X itself did. Without resolutions
defined, I expected 640x480, not some very high resolution. I wonder if my
display would have survived after a bit of time.
I do like the Gentoo approach. But I will be glad when a new stable release
is available. I am suprised at how many things are masked.
--
+============================+===============================+
| Roger Oberholtzer | E-mail: roger at opq.se |
| OPQ Systems AB | WWW: http://www.opq.se/ |
| Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 | Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 |
| 115 32 Stockholm | Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 |
| Sweden | Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 |
+============================+===============================+
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list