gcc 3.2.1... it works.

[m.w.chang]

can you correct me? I knew you knew what I was actually talking about.. :)

Net Llama! wrote:
> errr...what's a "2.95.3 library"??
> 
> On 12/03/02 18:05, m.w.chang wrote:
>> yes, but what about all those 2.95.3 libaries? can 3.2.1 gcc binaries
>> work with older 2.95.3 gcc librarise? I heard that 3.2.x is *not*
>> downward compatible. You have to go all the away...
>> 

-- 
   .~.    Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
  / v \   http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\  Linux 2.4.20
   ^ ^    6:58am up 3 days, 17:44, 1 user, load average: 1.11, 1.09, 1.09