gcc 3.2.1... it works.

[Net Llama!]

errr...what's a "2.95.3 library"??

On 12/03/02 18:05, m.w.chang wrote:
> yes, but what about all those 2.95.3 libaries? can 3.2.1 gcc binaries
> work with older 2.95.3 gcc librarise? I heard that 3.2.x is *not*
> downward compatible. You have to go all the away...
> 
>> I compiled it on an old desktop running OpenLinux 3.1.1. Well... it works.
>> Compiled binaries are a bit larger than the same binary compiled with 2.95.3. It
>> hogs more processor power and... well... Nothing new that I noticed. :')
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                       	       netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: 		    http://netllama.ipfox.com

   6:05pm  up 2 days,  3:33,  1 user,  load average: 0.47, 0.22, 0.13