ext3 Bug in 2.4.20

Douglas J Hunley doug
Mon May 17 11:41:05 PDT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

kwall at kurtwerks.com spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> than I do. I have nothing against XFS; it's a superior solution. I'm here
> at ext3, though, it ain't broken, so I don't feel the need to fix it.

I concur. While I spew the benefits of ext3, I recognize that JFS and XFS and 
even Reiser have their merits. And some are *clearly* better in this or that 
case. We should all just acknowledge that this another one of those 'vi vs 
emacs' kinds of things. We all like our personal favorites. There's nothing 
wrong with that. But bashing the others without evidence feels like 
trolling... (yes, I'm guilty of it from time to time)
- -- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
	and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

panic("sun_82072_fd_inb: How did I get here?");
        2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/include/asm-sparc/floppy.h
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE97VR5SrrWWknCnMIRAtfWAJ934I/VaGmAFvsQppebzJELWMZxjgCfUMQn
wx3R5DWcL39dqsbgSKFVvgo=
=OTCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Linux-users mailing list