checkinstall-1.5.3
Douglas J Hunley
doug
Mon May 17 11:39:31 PDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> I noticed that it used a command "rpm-build"
> it it from rpm-4.x only?
>
yes.
> could I safely replace it with "rpm" so that I could use it with rpm-3.x?
yes. howerver, I suggest making rpm-build a symlink so that if you ever
upgrade to 4.x it will properly overwrite the 'fake' binary
>
> and is it safe to just grab the source and upgrade my rpm 3.x to 4.x for
> COL 3.1?
safe? yes. easy? not really. and there's no real reason. use the latest 3.x
version and you can use 3.x and 4.x based rpms
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org
printk("; corrupted filesystem mounted read/write - your computer
will explode within 20 seconds ... but you wanted it so!\n");
2.4.3 linux/fs/hpfs/super.c
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9vtc5SrrWWknCnMIRAjRlAJ4siH91im3h/FlUb9I13kGKAhy4BQCgvyoT
CKRlmUbk7i/iPyw2j1kVyjE=
=2RNK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list