libstdc++ [2]

[Richard R. Sivernell]

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:55:54 +0800
"m.w.chang" <mwchang at netvigator.com> wrote:

> compilation of gcc will produce a libstdc++. how does it differ from the 
> standalone ilbstdc++ package?
> 
> also, I couldnt' compile my own libstdc++. there is no install.sh in the 
> tar-ball.
> 
> Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
> > Why would you think that?
> > it is stl code for c++, is it not. If so you 
> > would need to replave the code itself.
> > 
> 
> -- 
>   Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly.  .~.   In Linux we trust.
>                                 / v \
>   news://news.hkpcug.org       /( _ )\  http://www.linux-sxs.org
>                                  ^ ^
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> Linux-users at linux-sxs.org
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc ->
> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Several different programs make their own libsdc++. I do not rebuild this
on my system. I do however do use stlport, you can build it.

cheers
-- 
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas  75287
972 306-2296
res005ru at gte.net
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered Linux User

   .~.
  / v \
 /( _ )\
   ^ ^
In Linux we trust!