libstdc++ [2]
m.w.chang
mwchang
Mon May 17 11:39:14 PDT 2004
compilation of gcc will produce a libstdc++. how does it differ from the
standalone ilbstdc++ package?
also, I couldnt' compile my own libstdc++. there is no install.sh in the
tar-ball.
Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
> Why would you think that?
> it is stl code for c++, is it not. If so you
> would need to replave the code itself.
>
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^
More information about the Linux-users
mailing list