libstdc++ [2]

m.w.chang mwchang
Mon May 17 11:39:14 PDT 2004


compilation of gcc will produce a libstdc++. how does it differ from the 
standalone ilbstdc++ package?

also, I couldnt' compile my own libstdc++. there is no install.sh in the 
tar-ball.

Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
> Why would you think that?
> it is stl code for c++, is it not. If so you 
> would need to replave the code itself.
> 

-- 
  Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly.  .~.   In Linux we trust.
                                / v \
  news://news.hkpcug.org       /( _ )\  http://www.linux-sxs.org
                                 ^ ^



More information about the Linux-users mailing list